• Home
  • Who we are
    • John Durham
    • Chris Arens
    • Jim Nichols
  • What we do
  • Clients/Partners
  • Intelligence
  • Case Studies
    • Freewheel.tv
    • Del Monte Foods
    • Travel Ad Network
    • Additional Case Studies
  • Contact

Archives

Monthly Archive for: ‘March, 2011’

Home / 2011 / March

March Madness – “Technology Style” (Mediapost 3.23.11) 0

Welcome to one of my favorite times of the year; March Madness!

You might think I’m referring to the time of year when college basketball re-emerges as an obsession and my free time is dedicated to rooting for my favorite teams, calculating probabilities for upsets and cheering on the underdogs.  On one level I am, but I can also say the same thing for the time of year when Apple announces new products, and rumors run rampant about new products they’ve yet to announce.  It seems like every March or so when the blogs have a new Apple-related topic to run with.  It’s become an annual event!

Much like the NCAA College Basketball Tournament, the press latches on to hypothesize and debate whether Apple products will meet expectations and “win the championship”.  March Madness this year is centered on the launch of the iPad 2 and the rumors around the iPhone 5.  The iPad and the iPhone have defined two distinct categories and continue to represent the cream of the crop.  They’re the Duke and North Carolina of the technology world.  Much like Duke and North Carolina, they put forth a great team year after year and everyone is gunning for them.  Much like Duke and North Carolina, there are lots of people who dislike them, and even more who attempt to emulate them, and even more who want to be them.  The Android platform, on the other hand, is the Kansas of the category; they seem to be winning a lot more as of late, but looks can be deceiving.  The Android platform continues to grow because of distribution and not being tied down to a single carrier or handset.  It’s like having a junior college or a prep school that spits out great talent into the elite college programs year after year, and rarely gets the recognition.  The Android platform may be a winning platform, but it has yet to have the single device that marries simplicity with an innovative form.  Android may get the distribution, but Apple is winning the awards. 

According to Apple, the 2nd generation iPad sold over 500,000 units in the first weekend.  The first generation of the device sold over 15 million in the first nine months.  The device isn’t perfect, but nobody is.  People have tried to create and sell tablets in the past, but Apple made it feasible.  Android platforms are coming out to market, but they don’t have the excitement and buzz that the iPad has.  They don’t even rate a 2 seed or a 3 seed.  They seem to get no higher than a 4 seed, because consumers are smitten with the strength of schedule for the iPad and some of its impressive wins.  It took on a new role, it’s improving upon itself and it’s continuing to sell.  To go down another sports analogy; it’s the west coast offense of technology.  Once you see it in action, you want one.  All the competition tries to replicate it, and some people will get it right!

The same can be said for the iPhone.  The rumors around the new version include a metal backing, a larger display, a better antenna and NFC included.  If that’s the case, Apple will have another best-seller on its hands.  Of course, you could announce that they’re coming out with a new purple iPhone and the masses would get excited!

The lasting impact of March Madness “technology-style” is actually a lesson to anyone trying to build a brand.  It’s a mixture of innovation and consistency.  Like the auto-industry, it’s also based on planned obsolescence.  Step 1; build a product that truly is unique, groundbreaking and stylistically innovative.  Step 2; build simple, consistent, easy-to-understand messaging around your unique offering and surround your audience with that message.  Step 3; create regular excitement, in this case annually, where your audience can look forward to something new and interesting.  Step 4; revisit your product or service and never rest on your laurels.  If you follow these easy to understand steps you could create a brand as strong and beautiful as Apple.

In the meantime; good luck with your brackets!  I hope you pick a winner! 

 

 

Posted on: 03-27-2011
Posted in: treffiletti.com

COD: Mixtent aims at cracking the professional reputation nut 0

Thanks to for publishing this first

I first learned about in mid February, and was fascinated by both the notion of collective reputation measurement and the role it could play in making better hiring decisions. Let’s face it, making the decision to hire people is always a bit of a crap shoot. You can check references but rare is the person that cannot find three schmucks to vouch for them. Further, the fluid nature of job roles in the modern organization means that the same job title can require one set of skills in one company, and quite a different set in another.

We all know that hiring and retaining great staff are huge challenges on both the agency and brand sides. I am going to use the role of Media Supervisor as an example of why deep reputation information can be essential to making better choices. One assignment might require intimate knowledge of the bleeding edge, another an extraordinary mentoring ability, and the third the ability to build a stronger relationship with a client. We none of us are strong at everything.

What does is uses your personal Linked In network, and a binary either or rating system to provide a picture of an individual based upon the opinions of people that they are connected to.

You join Mixtent by connecting it to your LinkedIn profile. From there, the platform defines a range of skills connected to your experience, and has the community rate you versus other connections on those skills.

In turn, you get to rate people you know on their experience sets. As I mentioned earlier, the ratings system is binary. Would you rather work with person A or person B on a project requiring the given skill set?

The platform gathers all of the ratings of all of the people and gives you a percentile rank versus others with the same skill sets. Your percentile rank is only calculated AFTER you have received 20 ratings, which is designed to limit the impact of being flamed by an individual you are connected to. And to give the data genuine validity.

How will this be useful in hiring and management decisions? Well, for a start, it gives you a more quantitatively valid view of an individual’s strengths. It’ll help you decide whether candidate A or candidate B might be more appropriate for that Media Supe assignment that requires strong managerial skills. Because you won’t be relying on a few interviews and self-selected references.

BTW, your ratings of individuals are kept private – that’s another inherent strength of the system requiring more than 20 votes before it calculates your percentile rank. That way you can be honest without fear of repercussions.

This is a new service, and for now only your connections can see your rankings. Additionally, if you see your ratings and dislike the answers, you can opt right out. Tech Crunch said that this is important to building a successful professional reputation platform. In their words:

Your peers can vote on you anonymously, so you don’t have the LinkedIn issue where people glad-hand recommendations for one another, but there is no way to enter text so the site doesn’t evolve in the defamation morass of Honestly either. Also, unlike Honestly (born as Unvarnished), you have to opt-in to Mixtent, and if you don’t like the results, you can opt out. I think that’s essential to any reputation system. If you build a good enough product, people will use it without being bullied or forced into it.

I can only guess where Mixtent is going. But I think the model is well designed, and the information very valuable. It’ll become even more valuable as the ranking algorithms get more and more accurate. Keep an eye out for this team – I think they are on to something very valuable.

Posted on: 03-21-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

COD: Tecca and the New Way to Sell 0

Thanks to for publishing this first.

Big box retail has brought consumer benefits, but there have also been costs. No, I am not going to get all Mary Harris “Mother” Jones on you, though if you asked me to lunch I certainly could. Rather, I am going to come at this from a different perspective: How difficult it can be to make a good decision on purchases, particularly electronic purchases when you’re standing in a warehouse-sized store and the electronics clerk is outside having a smoke.

Because let’s face it, if you go to a big electronics retailer, the “help” you get is pretty spotty. All the happy well informed employee TV ads don’t make up for the time when you have $2000 in your pocket for some washer dryer set, and the employee (when you find one) only knows which is the LG and which the Vizio. I can read logos, what I want is some insight on the strengths and weaknesses of each.

is a relatively new website designed to create a community expressly for sharing opinions about electronics. Best Buy funded it through its Fuse Capital venture. The site has massive amounts of information on electronics, from product specifications, to news, to reviews from multiple sources, to UGC reviews. Here’s the intro flick:

Tecca also incorporates extensive pricing information from Best Buy (natch) and a multitude of other retailers. Listings arrange prices in ascending order, so the cheapest retailer wins top billing. Now, Best Buy is the national electronics big box left standing so naturally they win their share of these arrangements. But the site does not always list Best Buy first.

You use Tecca through iPhone, Android, or iPad apps, or online. But obviously, this is primarily a mobile play because that’s where most people are deciding what to choose.

I did see Kmart on a pricing listing once, but even by typing in eight models that I pulled off either Target and/or Wal-Mart sites, I never got either company in the price comparison results. I don’t know whether those two retailers aren’t participating by their choice or by Tecca’s. Or if indeed this was a fluke of the database. But given that Target and Wal-Mart have more limited selections, they wouldn’t end up in most searches anyway.

Why should you care about this if you aren’t in the electronics biz? I think the emergence of Tecca reflects a new reality in the way business needs to act in order to make a sale. In a world where consumers don’t or cannot trust retailers to provide unbiased perspective on products, they need resources that they can consult that are credible. I don’t doubt that having reviews available on product pages is beneficial, but if you’re the suspicious sort, as am I, there is often the sense that a richer story is available in an editorially driven community.

So for the rest of this, I am going to assume that Tecca and Best Buy understand that an effort to systematically exclude a competitor would quickly be discerned, and that the traffic would disappear. I was impressed by both the breadth and depth of info available on the site, and the free flowing community discussions. There are other shopping and electronics recommendation communities out there, including many NOT funded by retailers, but Tecca really does offer a strong content platform.

When I buy electronics, I usually print out Consumer Reports reviews. And then I take them into a store and find that all the model numbers have changed. So having a community that includes items currently available has benefits.

Assuming Tecca IS offering a level playing field for other terrestrial retailers, having this sort of resource offsite offers a powerful way to help consumers make decisions. When you are Best Buy, your biggest competitor may be indecision.

I am not for a moment suggesting that there aren’t other places or other, possibly better content destinations out there. But having access to Tecca in iPhone and Android apps makes it beyond easy to use. Assuming they aren’t Best Warping the data, it’ll be very interesting to see how it does.

Posted on: 03-21-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

COD: Lanyrd is the super nifty social conference directory 0

Thanks to for publishing this first!

Do you go to a lot of conferences? Or do you only go to one, and spend a lot of time selecting the perfect event for your networking and personal development? Or do you fall somewhere in between? Or do you generally not get to go to conferences for reasons of cost or schedule, but wish you could get some insight into a killer session.

That paragraph is my long winded way of saying that whatever your interest in conferences, you should surf on over to Lanyrd, a site that provides great information and connection opportunities for hundreds of conferences around the world, with more added every day.

The site connects to your Twitter, and gives you a view of the particulars of the event, related links, a dashboard of speakers, related books, attendees, a conference calendar, and loads more. Users can link assets to the event like press coverage, videos, Slide Share decks, etc.

The community is based upon the idea that users, and of course event marketers, will contribute content, as with a Wiki. You list yourself and your relationship with an event (organizer, speaker, attendee) or you can simply track an event before you commit to attendance, and be updated with new information as it becomes available.

Users can also tag events with a view to helping people find relevant by topic, geography, or whatever makes sense.

In addition to in person events, the site offers the opportunity to list and learn about virtual conferences, which are becoming more and more common.

The value to event marketers is obvious, but it also helps facilitate the networking which is a vital draw to in person events. At an event as large as an ad:tech, for example, you might never know or see colleagues whoa re attending, and your experience might be enriched by spending time with them. Similarly, it enables you to make new connections with attendees that share interests, etc.

Explore the site by topic, by event name, or drill down into a particular attendee’s profile.

They’ve also taken out a lot of the friction that you may have experienced before Lanyrd was created. For example, you can export your conference schedule into Outlook and iCal, among others. You can even get little event badges for your personal site so you can let others know where you are going to be. An even deeper level of facilitating connections between people.

I think this is big stuff for the conference ecosystem. As a means of finding just the right event, following the discussion, and connecting with others, it is unique. All these are really important services in a very crowded industry category. And given that highly competitive business, it’s pretty easy to see how this tool will become a moneymaker by providing services to events, among others.

I’m not the only one who thinks so. They are getting money and advice from Y Combinator.

Posted on: 03-21-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

COD: Wishpond – Putting virtual in service of local bricks and mortar 0

The percentage of retail driven through ecommerce continues to grow, but it’s still in single digits. That being said, there is no doubt that consumers are using the web to do research on products, especially for more considered purchases.

Wishpondis out to drive more sales to brick and mortar, using geolocation to help small and large retailers make consumers aware of what they have in stock and ready to take home today.

Imagine you are looking for a fairly high end Nikon. You’ve done your research online, but now you are ready to buy. You COULD make a purchase through Amazon or Fry’s online, or you could fire up Wishpond and see if it is available anywhere nearby. Wishpond lets you search local retailers’ inventory to see who might have the item and for how much. Let’s say three retailers report having the item. You can then consider the trade offs of price, reputation, and distance to see if one of these retailers might be a better place to buy than an online store.

There are benefits for all of the players in the retailing ecosystem:

•For consumers, Wishpond gives an easy way to compare prices and the opportunity to get the good today. They can also “make a wish” meaning that they can offer to buy something at a certain price and see if any local retailer bites.
•For retailers, it provides the opportunity to spend ad dollars on people actually looking to buy, and a chance to level the playing field by communicating local availability of an item.
•For brands, the opportunity to communicate participating retailers gives another means of supporting your brick and mortar distribution system, and a way of growing sales. They could also advertise on the platform to impact buying decisions
•For publishers, the platform provides the opportunity to grow relevance to readers by making things like product recommendations more actionable. Not only can you recommend an item, you can now show consumers exactly where they might want to buy it. As such, it might also be a good advertiser lead gen tool.

This is an ads-supported platform. Retailers can join for free, or they can join and take advantage of the opportunity to do hyper local and highly targeted advertising to very likely buyers. They can even package up sales leads of people looking for an item.

We all know that the big retail winners over the past couple decades have been big box stores. But this platform levels the field, enabling even small retailers to capitalize on the technology and sales opportunities it surfaces. Though of course big box stores are also welcome to participate. And no doubt are and will.

One of the things that makes this a compelling platform is that Wishpond can plug into existing inventory management programs so the retailer doesn’t need to manually input items and manage inventory levels. Instead, it’s inventory speaks for itself.

There are other resources in this space, not least Milo and Google Blue Dot. But one of the ways that Wishpond stands out is that a business or pub can participate easily using an embeddable widget. These widgets can search inventory, show local locations, and even be embedded into distributed presences in social media. They also have an open API, which is helping them differentiate by shaping themselves as a platform rather than a retail search destination.

BTW, their blog is also an excellent resource if you just want to learn more about local and shopping and retailing in today’s environment.

Posted on: 03-21-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

COD: GlobalMojo is the browser that lets consumers and businesses give back 0

Thanks to for publishing this first.

As someone who came of age during the “greed is good” Eighties, I find it heartening that companies and consumers now have far greater interest in doing good. is a philanthropic browser that gives consumers the opportunity to do good as they go about their daily business online.

The browser, which is built on the open source Mozilla platform, donates 50% of gross revenues to schools and non-profits selected by the community as worthy causes.

Here’s the Explaniflick…

The offering essentially works like an affiliate, generating revenue when the consumer searches, browses, or makes purchases online using GlobalMojo. Because it is based upon Mozilla, it offers all of the customization options available through Firefox. But with this caring benefit overlay it may well become the choice of people who want to make a difference in more things that they do in the course of their daily lives.

There are essentially four channels of shared revenue:
• GlobalMojo Travel gives users the opportunity to compare results across a range of sites that pay the service a bounty for bookings. Travel site partners include Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, and more.
• GlobalMojo Shopping enables users to compare prices and products across more than 900 retailers that compensate the browser for purchases.
• Advertising and Search offer additional revenue channels.

The user selects the nonprofits s/he chooses to support, and can allocate the revenue they generate by assigning percentages to different organizations.

How much revenue are we talking about per user? Well, GlobalMojo estimates that each user will generate between $10-$30 for the charities of their choice. Not a fortune, but when combined with the donations for the behaviors of potentially millions of others, it’s easy to see that GlobalMojo can make a real difference in the world.

Of course, the beauty of the model for marketers and advertisers is that they can help do good by partnering with the company. Not only does it offer a new customer/revenue channel for online retailers – it also enables the company to do something good – and be seen doing something good by people who care deeply about such things. If you are a marketer looking for any of these benefits, visit this page to obtain more information.

Posted on: 03-21-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

Is Search Dead? (Mediapost 3.16.11) 0

Is search dead? 

From a business perspective the obvious answer is no, with as much as 40% of all online ad dollars going towards search.  From a consumer perspective, search is very much alive and well and actually increasing in its prominence when you factor in the growth of mobile search and people searching on the go.  The question I ask is whether anyone new can start a business in search and compete for revenue with Google in the marketplace.  I guess the real question is whether or not innovation and the opportunity for new ideas in the search category are dead.

There are a number of new start-ups trying to make a name for themselves in search, like Blekko and Topsy.   Some of these start-ups come at the business from the perspective of social search or mobile search.  Some try to innovate on the results formatting, or the results themselves, by bringing new algorithm’s into the mix.  Most never get picked up by the masses in the way Google did.  Google came along at the exact right moment in time, when Infoseek, Alta Vista, Webcrawler and the others were unable to keep up with the demand and provide accurate, fast results.    Google was simple, had little clutter, and professed to do nothing other than provide you with the results you need, when you need them.  They built a model on accuracy and speed, and to this day they still display the scope of results and the time to provide them, even in this age of instant results.

So the question remains, will anyone ever come along to challenge for the throne?  Is there room for someone else to come in, innovate, and create a viable, long-lasting business?  Bing has proven that if you have enough money, and a hook, people will give you a shot.  That translates (in my eyes) to the idea that Google does have some chinks in the armor.  Not everyone on earth wants Google to win.  That being said, the vast majority of the world really doesn’t care whether Google “wins” or not.  They just want to find stuff fast.

The opportunity, in my eyes, lies in the new platforms, like tablet computers and car dashboards.  The mobile space itself is a catch-all for these categories, but fundamentally it’s about apps and the experience off the computer.  Search in a different environment is still up for grabs, because as far as I can tell Google hasn’t made that move yet.  To the start-ups and new companies looking to unseat Google on the desktop, I wish you luck but I don’t bet much on your success.  Google has won that battle for a long time to come.  The battle that should be fought is the one in areas where they aren’t yet playing.  The battle involves new form factors and user interface, and it involves cataloguing local information more than the general library of the web.  Think of it as the battle between the Dewey Decimal System and the Phone Book (unfortunately some of you reading this article will have no frame of reference for either of these, but go with it).  The Dewey Decimal system catalogued a library, but was useless in the real world.  The Phone Book catalogued the world you live in, but was useless in the library.  The real world is like the Phone Book and that is where the opportunity exists.

Think of it another way; if someone builds a better mousetrap, with cooler colors, made from stainless steel and guaranteed to kill a mouse in 0.20 seconds, but the old mousetrap works just fine, everyone has the old mousetrap and your grandparents know how to use the old mousetrap really well, then no-one will buy the new mousetrap. It’s not cynicism, its realism. 

I think the opportunity for innovation in search lies off the computer and as search integrates into every other device.  That’s where I’d be betting my money.

Do you agree? 

 

Posted on: 03-18-2011
Posted in: treffiletti.com

I Love Click Rates! (Mediapost 3.9.11) 0

I love click rates!  I bet that got your attention, didn’t it? 

Back in college at Syracuse I took a journalism class, and Syracuse is known for spitting out world-class journalists.  They always taught us to begin a column with an attention grabbing first sentence, so that’s what I’m doing here – I’m trying to get your attention in the hopes that we can address this age-old issue!

I actually really hate click rates, and before you jump on my back for being hateful, let me make my case.  Back in 1994, when the first ad banners were placed online at HotWired, there wasn’t much to report on other than impressions and clicks, and the click rate was born.  That being said, you’d think that after 17 years we could come up with something else to talk about!  There have been fits and starts to get to a new metric, but now feels like the best time for us to join together and get this figured out.

At OMMA Global last week I finally heard some discussion around finding a new, better, more effective combination of metrics and I think I may have an idea.  I propose that we all begin to think about the SERF model for online analytics; Sessions, Engagement, Reach and Frequency.

SESSIONS

A number of years back there was talk about moving from impressions to sessions, and I think this model may have a lot of merit, especially as we are seeing more video be adopted online, where there is a value far beyond the standard impression.  A session can be tracked within any site, and a session can be priced at a higher value than a standard impression because you can own the experience with that user.  Think of it as category exclusivity within that user session.   It doesn’t mean we have to abandon the impression, but leveling it up to a session would seem to give us a better read on interaction with a brand, per user content session.

ENGAGEMENT

Most online marketers are already crafting their own models for engagement, and engagement actually does integrate click rate, along with conversion rate, interaction rate, action rate, and a host of other metrics that can be tailored to the needs of the marketer.  Engagement has been used as a catch-all for quite some time, so maybe the industry should finally embrace it and work to developing some standards against it.  At the very minimum, we can develop a few fully-baked models for defining engagement by business category or type of unit.

REACH & FREQUENCY

Reach and frequency are traditional metrics, and far too many online companies have tried to force them out of the picture, but they’re resilient, primarily because they make sense.  Reach denotes the size of the audience you contacted and frequency is the means by which your message is understood.  Reach and frequency may feel like old-school metrics, but they’re as important now as they have even been before.

If we could come up with an industry standard for evaluating the SERF model, maybe we could finally demote click rates to the same coffin as the 468×60, pop-ups and Pointcast.  At the very least, we would then have a model that integrates digital-only metrics, while also providing for an apples-to-apples comparison with TV.

Do you agree this could work or is there an even simpler model to speak to?  Let me know what you think on the Spin Board!

 

Posted on: 03-13-2011
Posted in: treffiletti.com

The ABCs of DMPs 0

Special thanks to for publishing this first!

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:
• DMPs deliver marketing performance benefits by helping companies learn from the totality of marketing information they collect and purchase
• Brands deserve to collect and keep all of the information they pay to buy, collect, and base action upon. DMPs bring this all together
• A DMP can take a general target, like women aged 18-34, and subdivide it into groupings that help you plan and execute marketing efforts more effectively

From the beginning digital marketing data have been both a potential boon and a missed opportunity for the vast majority of marketers. The ability to track and analyze virtually every aspect of marketing communications brings with it a very real challenge to do more than react to bits and pieces of that information.

In our changed world we have the ability to learn about our customers and prospects constantly. But this relentless flow of information — from different channels and through different tools — needs to be gathered, combined, and analyzed in a timely manner in order to capitalize on its value.

A new category of marketing services companies is emerging to help answer all these questions: data management platforms (DMPs). Oh, I just detected audible groaning. Another category of middlemen? Call Kawaja to update the slide (no need, I’m sure he’s way ahead of you). I feel your pain, but I also believe that this set of marketing services and companies may really make a difference in our businesses.

In my view, two recent-ish news items reflect the growing importance. The first was the emergence of Red Aril, a start-up led by Jim Soss and Kira Makagon, two well known advertising/ technology veterans. Red Aril is a DMP with a platform created through over 150 man-years of development. The second key item is the recent purchase of DMP Demdex by Adobe. This will add dynamic online ad targeting capabilities to the Adobe Online Marketing Suite.

Both are signs of the likely growth potential in this arena.

The problem: Too many data buckets
The customer relationship management (CRM) team uses Prizm to analyze and segment your hand raisers. The media team buys a variety of third-party data sources to target ads through the exchanges. The market research group commissions important studies that parse and segment customers and provide valuable lifestyle and psychographic insight. And the web team uses Omniture and Quantcast to understand whose visiting and how their demographics and lifestyles impact pages visited, time spent, and purchases. And the social media folks gather learning from activity on Facebook pages and across other online venues.

Sound familiar?

Naturally, marketers have (or should have) some knowledge of all these efforts. But does the data come together? It really really should.

Mark Silva, founder and EVP, emerging platforms for Real Branding, put it this way:
“Think of it as a spectrum that runs from collecting data, to understanding behavior, to identifying and leveraging real insights that answer the question of why people do what they do. In my view, you need to triangulate at least three data sets in order to understand behavior: advertising performance, CRM metrics, and social analytics. Understanding behavior isn’t insight per se, but it’s a critical step in identifying genuine insights.”

Without connecting the dots, too many questions remain either unanswered. Peter Platt, president of PSquared Digital, provided this example:

“Too often, digital efforts are looked at in a silo unto themselves and we miss the real impact that our advertising efforts are having. A great example of this just happened the other day. I was reviewing a law firm client’s web analytics and we saw a huge spike in traffic from search last September. Turns out the hero in this effort wasn’t our search marketing program but rather a heavy TV flight during that time period. In this example we had visibility into the overall marketing effort, but if we hadn’t there might have been erroneous decisions made about how to allocate resources.”

Peter’s effort clearly helped his team find the underlying truth. But why isn’t all our learning leveraged fully? Because, in addition to it being in different places, it’s difficult to rationalize and standardize data sets, and then examine that massive data bank for real insights.

Enter the DMP.

The value of data aggregation
Duh. If you have a tool that can handle it, more relevant data is better. And quite frankly, if we are spending time and money aggregating irrelevant data, well then… I’ll let Tamara Bousquet, SVP-media director of MEA Digital, say it for me:

“My sole focus is to stay ahead of this ever-changing landscape and deliver actionable results for our clients; squeeze every cent of value out of our client’s budget. We find a key challenge for most clients is accurate attribution for different marketing tactics and sales analytics. My team’s analytic approach and deep knowledge of the rich first party information and resources help us understand exactly how all tactics, online and offline, impact our clients business and how to best deliver a positive result.”

Tamara is not alone in leading her team to do this. But the arrival of tools that can do this on a more granular and comprehensive basis can make the process easier, and potentially more effective.


How DMPs work

So what are these things, anyway? In their current incarnations, DMPs deliver marketing performance benefits by helping companies learn from the totality of marketing information they collect and purchase. They represent the antithesis of data silos.

At its core, a great DMP needs to do four things:

•Aggregate data sources: DMPs are designed to take disparate data sets and combine them into a single, actionable data set. We all know that different tools and platforms gather and collect info in different ways. A DSP partner will set up your instance to take into account the sources and differences of your data sets so that information comes together constantly and consistently, with few errors.

•It is essential to know if the platform you select is capable of parsing the information you already have and shows evidence it is planning (or already work with) many more data set flavors. Because one thing we all know is that what we use today may not be what we are using tomorrow. I’m not talking about all of your company’s data (that’s IBM’s job, or Oracle’s). Rather, DMPs focus on marketing relevant information.

•Give you information ownership: Brands deserve to collect and keep all of the information they pay to buy, collect, and base action upon. DMPs bring it all together so that more insights are possible from the combined totality of information.

•Analyze and model: Once the data come together, DMPs offer the means to derive critical information from the data, and work to segment your audience into groups that may warrant tailored marketing efforts. On a blockhead-simple level, a DMP can take a general target, like women aged 18-34, and subdivide it into groupings that help you plan and execute marketing efforts more effectively. This could be based on important demographic criteria, more esoteric psychographic/sociographic ways, or ways you haven’t even considered yet. It may also identify heretofore overlooked populations that may be prime opportunities.

•Drive action: The DMP helps to refine and sharpen ad targeting approaches and purchase media more precisely. For example, a DMP could empower better purchase decisions on the ad exchanges, and continue to collect and refine the learning for greater future precision. This is the “immediate value” DMPs can provide.
Jim Soss, CEO of Red Aril, describes the value proposition of his DMP thusly:

“Red Aril’s DMP was designed explicitly for real-time channels, the ability to leverage all data, and the integration with a broader marketing database strategy. Our clients see the proof every day — data drives relevancy, relevancy drives results.”

A key part of the aggregation service is a standardization of taxonomy. Indeed, it is a critical part of successfully merging data. Scalability is also a critical consideration. A large brand could be experiencing and recording billions of interactions a month across its marketing efforts. The DMP can only be successful if it is able to store, process, and act upon what could easily become an avalanche of data points.

DSP, DMP, LMNOP
Some of you are thinking that other types of marketing service providers offer some of these benefits.

You’re right. They do.

DSPs, for example, are collecting information in real time and using it to dynamically optimize campaigns and programs and enable users to integrate first-party data in real time. Some DSPs are encouraging users to run all their buys through their platforms to provide a more comprehensive audience view.

For example, MediaMath (disclosure, a CSF client) has put a major focus on providing many of the services that are traditionally the turf of DMPs. Their approach is to empower all buying with first and third party data, not just inventory bought on the exchanges. The principle of empowerment through data naturally has big benefits for pub direct. And most brands do not live by exchanges alone. I think it’s natural to expect that all the brands we associate with the DSP sector to move in this direction over time.

The most technologically sophisticated ad networks also work with first-party data, when you choose to provide it. For any business that uses data to define and refine what it is buying or working for you, the race is on to do more with more. As we all know, convergence is the middle name of our industry.

DMP is about driving action from the totality of your marketing-relevant consumer information. You know better than I do whether you are already doing that using a solution that describes itself by whatever name. If not, then the value of the DMP may be significant for you.

In my view, the ideal company for a DMP has data-intensive marketing practices and tactics, and is sophisticated enough that it is focused on incremental marketing improvement. What I mean by that last bit is that a DMP is great for a company that knows it’s doing a lot of things right, and is now looking to drive improvements on their good general direction.

But back to initials. My suggestion is, don’t get caught up in the monikers. Rather, consider whether you think bringing all the data together is likely to provide enough of a business benefit to justify the time and money required to do so. Do you have a strong CRM database? Are you really collecting great information on the site? Are you dealing with multiple media vendors collecting and purchasing data on your behalf separately? If the answer is yes, a DMP may well make sense for you.

Who will adopt these first? DR brands probably come to mind, because the initial focus for actionability will be in ad targeting. But it would be a big mistake for so called brand marketers to discount the value of more complete view of the consumer.

And consider this: data aggregation and modeling is not the same is genuine consumer insight. Says Mark Silva,

“In our business, first customers often have disproportionate influence on how the category plays out. DMPs need to be aware that while their first customers may be DR marketers looking for the magic data bullets that drive incremental sales improvement, behavioral information is not insight. Ultimately their success in the market will be significantly determined by the extent to which they offer the tools and opportunities for brand marketers and agencies to discover genuine behavioral insights. They’re good at getting to the ‘what’ — but they need to also empower us to get to the ‘why’.”

I like that as a concluding thought. It makes sense to get that data together and empower your marketing with it. But don’t leave it at that. It’s not their job to do our thinking for us. We need data to find the answer, and the most effective marketing is going to come from both actionable data and a heckuvalot of noggin’ scratchin’ to discover the seeds of overall brand relevance.

Posted on: 03-12-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

Start-Up Watch COD: KarmaKorn lets you challenge others to do good 0

Special thanks to for publishing this first.

Cause marketing has become increasingly popular for brands – to give just one example, Pepsi is basing a huge portion of their marketing on it. When a brand as big as the big P makes a decision like that, it’s apparent that both consumers and marketers value it as a marketing strategy.

is an early stage start-up that is helping consumers – and brands challenge their connections to take action on important causes. The goal of this self-funded start-up is to make social media and networks more than just places for wasting time and gaming. Rather, they want people to challenge and be challenged to take positive steps that improve society and address persistent problems.

It works like this. You connect to the FB app, and read or post challenges that encourage some form of positive action. It might be something fairly simple, like pledging not to consume any plastic retail bags for a week. Or it might be taking action in your community, or uploading a video, or signing a petition.

There’s an important virtual currency layer to all this. Each positive action by a consumer earns Korn kernels – the number of kernels earned relates to the complexity and commitment required to complete the challenge. You use the Korn to challenge others to take action and earn their own kernels. Their goal is to create a virtual economy for good. Having more Korn also becomes a badge of honor, if you will, which gives people emotional reward for their positive actions.

Here’s the overview flick:

KarmaKorn uses FB to take the challenges – and the concept itself – viral. What I like about that is that most people would like to do more for others, but find it difficult to keep the goal top of mind what with so many other life priorities.

From a brand perspective, participation in cause marketing in social media adds an important noticing value and virality to the program. The Chicago-based KarmaKorn team is open to working with brands that have a genuine interest in doing well by doing good.

I could see a brand making a platform like this the center of cause marketing. Or simply using KarmaKorn as a means of magnifying the impact of their cause marketing efforts in earned media. Whichever way you slice it, now is the time to ensure that your cause marketing is as social as can be.

Posted on: 03-12-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer
Page 1 of 3123»

Recent Posts

  • Industry News for 05082012
  • Industry Links for 05072012
  • Industry Links for 05092012
  • Simplifying the Display Landscape
  • Viral Vid: Alex and Liam do Wal*Mart
A member of the collective of companies
© 2010-2011 Catalyst SF All Rights Reserved. Website by