• Home
  • Who we are
    • John Durham
    • Chris Arens
    • Jim Nichols
  • What we do
  • Clients/Partners
  • Intelligence
  • Case Studies
    • Freewheel.tv
    • Del Monte Foods
    • Travel Ad Network
    • Additional Case Studies
  • Contact

Archives

All Posts Tagged Tag: ‘DMP’

Home / Tag: DMP

Not All Inventory Was Created Equal (Mediapost 5.2.12) 0

We’re heading into a phase of the online ad business that’s clearly based on the concept that not all inventory was created equal.  The fervor around the viewable ads issue, coupled with the rapid development of Data Management Platforms (DMP) which make marketers smarter about how they spend their money, leads us to a situation where placement, audience and performance of creative can influence the value of the inventory that’s available.  That means changes are in store for the media buying community.

To date, most online ad pricing has been one dimensional, and tied either to context or a basic set of data parameters, but the issues mentioned above are becoming hot buttons and leading us towards new opportunities.  These include dynamic pricing, upfront markets and a changing perception of the landscape for supply and demand of online inventory. 

It’s inevitable that there will become a finite supply of premium, higher quality inventory for advertisers as more advertisers become smarter.  The potential resolve on the viewable ads issue means more marketers will be competing for a smaller set of inventory, whether it be contextual, audience-based or more likely a combination of both.  Conversely, the market for junk inventory will drop.  This creates a situation where demand and supply lead to a fluctuating marketplace, more like financial markets.   This could lead to realistic upfront markets finally being established in the online space, which have not previously been required.  In the past, there was the perception of limitless supply for premium inventory, but that’s simply not the case.  The best sites and the best placements are being bought in advance, and that’s going to happen more often.

The other factor that leads to this situation is the increased use of DMP’s by marketers.  As more marketers become intelligent about the ways they spend their money, they could end up competing for the same inventory, or at least similar customers.   Right now, the use of a DMP is a competitive advantage for a marketer, but it will become table stakes in the next 12-18 months, and the result is the long tail of media will be become more valuable, and the “extra-long” tail will be devalued as more marketers squeeze value out of the top 50% of available inventory online.

The other factor that gets overlooked is performance.  If the interaction rates and engagement rates don’t increase in online ads, then only the most visible, more premium inventory will be considered valuable.  The long and extra-long tail of inventory will see no value at all.  Regardless of whether they price on performance or not, you can’t squeeze blood from a stone.  If the inventory can’t drive performance with poor creative, then the advertisers will place the blame on the inventory, unfortunately rather than taking the blame for poor creative, and they’ll focus their dollars on only the top notch placements and audience.  It won’t be far, but it will be a fact.

So the fact is not all inventory is created equal, and the immediate future for media buying is going to be changing quickly.  Upfronts may become a necessity.  A futures and secondary spot market may soon become a reality.  The perception that there is a finite supply for premium inventory will become commonplace, and prices may indeed begin to increase.

Do you agree?

Posted on: 05-4-2012
Posted in: treffiletti.com

The “Futures” Of Ad Exchanges? (Mediapost 2.29.12) 0

What’s the future of the ad exchange model?  It’s clear that ad exchanges and DMP’s are the future of the media business as media has become more and more of a commodity and data has become a requirement to add value, but where are things headed?

Many people refer to the commodities exchanges as the future of the ad exchange model, but to do so requires there be a marketplace for the buy and hold of media assets.  At first I was skeptical of that version of the future because there are not too many media buying shops willing to take the liability of those media assets on their books, but then I realized that market already exists and thrives and its called the Upfront.  In the television Upfronts, marketers and agencies buy and hold the media until a later time of the year, in some cases they put them all to use and in some cases they put them back into the market as scatter, taking the financial hit in the form of a cancellation clause.  If marketers had the chance to buy, hold and resell that media at either a profit or at least a break-even, wouldn’t they consider that?

The “futures” market is a tenuous one, especially in a volatile stock market and one where economic indicators are so across the board chaotic, but the advertising marketplace continues to grow.  More money is flowing into TV advertising every year, and the Internet continues to expand regardless of the almost infinite supply of impressions.  OOH and print may not be growing, but they are still finite assets that retain value, and marketers still want to take advantage of them.  A futures marketplace could indeed be valuable if the marketers and agencies were set up to take advantage of it.

The agency category is the one I find the most interesting here, because it’s the model that has been most in flux over the last 10 years.  The Internet and digital, more than anything, pushed margin’s down on agency commissions and as a result the agencies have been innovating to find new revenue streams.  Creative continues to be uncommoditizable, and strategy continues to be only semi-monetizable, so the agencies have focused on media buying – specifically by creating trading desks and analytics groups.  The agencies are focusing on the data and they are driving the media landscape into a commodities market.  If you agree this is the case, then it makes sense that the agency category may shift to a buy and hold strategy for media.  Some agencies do it already and have done it for years by entering into upfront agreements with the portals and larger publishers.  If you have money in the bank, and you know you’re going to be buying media for your clients, why not try to buy it at the low and sell it at a profit, which is still probably a discount to your clients?

Of course there’s the argument that the large marketers and public companies might be the ones to take advantage of this model because ultimately they are the ones who buy the media, and are ultimately responsible for its use.  I can foresee a model where the marketers buy the media on the market, hold and pay their agencies to put it to good use, rather than paying them a commission for it.  There could even become a secondary market for marketers who want to trade and barter media for their benefit.  The opportunity is endless if you commit to the idea that media can be bought, held and sold on a futures platform rather than the way most agencies buy now, which is last minute and through manual insertion orders.

For this model to truly succeed, the media buying agencies need to mature.  Currently they are full of young, undeveloped, and in too many cases poorly trained, buyers.  These new buyers would be analysts and traders.  They would be evaluating trends and matching those market trends against the needs of the clients.  I don’t see these buyers being compensated to the same scale as Wall Street bankers, but I see them commanding stronger salaries than the current media buyers.  It’s a skill and one that could not be easily replaced by some smart person off the street.

What do you think?  Can a future’s model succeed in this business?  Would it have to be cross-platform, encompassing online and offline, or could a stand-alone online marketplace exist and survive?  Let me know what you think by posting a comment on the Spin Board!

Posted on: 03-4-2012
Posted in: treffiletti.com

WWCD: Launching A New Advertising Technology Company 0

Lots of new technology company’s launch in advertising every month.  DSP’s, DMP’s, targeting platforms, social platforms, rich media and ad-servers; its almost too many to try and keep up with.  To break through the clutter of the marketplace and secure adoption with agencies and brands can be an arduous task (I know since its what I do for companies), but there’s one very valuable tool in the marketing of a new ad tech company that I can share; it’s your sales people.

Your sales people are crucial hires for more reasons that you probably even know.  The obvious reason is they bring in revenue.  They are responsible for monetizing your platform, they create relationships and they create capital, which your company uses to grow.  All that is extremely important, but you should never overlook just how important they are for the image, perception and awareness of your brand.

Sales people are your first impression in the marketplace.  Your execs may be fantastic, but 9 out of 10 of your customers will not meet the company through your execs, they will meet it through your sales people.  You need to arm your sales people with the right kinds of messaging, a single point of view regarding how your services fit into the marketplace, and the tools they need to create lasting relationships.  Everything they do, everything they say, and every action they take in the marketplace is a reflection on your company, especially in the early days . 

To that end, it is extremely important that you do your homework when interviewing and potentially hiring sales people.  Not only should they be intelligent, energetic and fun, but they need to be responsible, professional and full of integrity.  When you review a potential candidate, don’t forget to check their Facebook page, their LinkedIn page and do a Google search (especially a Google image search) to see what comes up.   You want people who are fun, but not fun to the degree where they could misrepresent you publicly in some manner.  Everyone knows the role of a sales person is to create relationships and sell your product, but relationships are a delicate thing and you want to be able to retain those relationships in the long term. 

Its also good to find out were a sales person has been before, how their previous position ended, and what kind of relationships they are going to take with them in their next roles.  Too often, there are sales people with a history of jumping around and selling their wares as “the best thing since sliced bread”.  After too many of those jumps, their relationships on the agency and client side are toast because everyone knows they’ll be somewhere else in 6 months.  They lose credibility, and once a sales person loses credibility, they’ve lost everything they have that allows them to sell.

Credibility and the ability to create and foster mutually beneficial relationships; these two characteristics transfer over to a company very quickly if the sales person has them as strengths.  In that situation, your marketing efforts, whatever they may be, have an easier time being successful. 

When a VP of Marketing or a CMO enters into a new job with a new advertising technology or media company, they typically will sit down and create a marketing strategy, but they should also sit down and review the assets of the sales team and determine if those assets are in line with the marketing of the company.  If there’s a Chief Revenue Officer or VP of Sales in place, this should be done in conjunction with them, and it should be done right away. 

Sales and marketing typically go hand in hand, but too often it’s about the numbers, and not enough about the characteristics of the teams.  If you’ve got a good plan, but the team isn’t right, nothing you do will be successful.  At the very least, success will be a more difficult up-hill climb than it needs to be.

As for the rest of the secrets I know, those are staying with me for the time being.

How are your sales teams measuring up?

Posted on: 05-8-2011
Posted in: treffiletti.com

The ABCs of DMPs 0

Special thanks to for publishing this first!

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:
• DMPs deliver marketing performance benefits by helping companies learn from the totality of marketing information they collect and purchase
• Brands deserve to collect and keep all of the information they pay to buy, collect, and base action upon. DMPs bring this all together
• A DMP can take a general target, like women aged 18-34, and subdivide it into groupings that help you plan and execute marketing efforts more effectively

From the beginning digital marketing data have been both a potential boon and a missed opportunity for the vast majority of marketers. The ability to track and analyze virtually every aspect of marketing communications brings with it a very real challenge to do more than react to bits and pieces of that information.

In our changed world we have the ability to learn about our customers and prospects constantly. But this relentless flow of information — from different channels and through different tools — needs to be gathered, combined, and analyzed in a timely manner in order to capitalize on its value.

A new category of marketing services companies is emerging to help answer all these questions: data management platforms (DMPs). Oh, I just detected audible groaning. Another category of middlemen? Call Kawaja to update the slide (no need, I’m sure he’s way ahead of you). I feel your pain, but I also believe that this set of marketing services and companies may really make a difference in our businesses.

In my view, two recent-ish news items reflect the growing importance. The first was the emergence of Red Aril, a start-up led by Jim Soss and Kira Makagon, two well known advertising/ technology veterans. Red Aril is a DMP with a platform created through over 150 man-years of development. The second key item is the recent purchase of DMP Demdex by Adobe. This will add dynamic online ad targeting capabilities to the Adobe Online Marketing Suite.

Both are signs of the likely growth potential in this arena.

The problem: Too many data buckets
The customer relationship management (CRM) team uses Prizm to analyze and segment your hand raisers. The media team buys a variety of third-party data sources to target ads through the exchanges. The market research group commissions important studies that parse and segment customers and provide valuable lifestyle and psychographic insight. And the web team uses Omniture and Quantcast to understand whose visiting and how their demographics and lifestyles impact pages visited, time spent, and purchases. And the social media folks gather learning from activity on Facebook pages and across other online venues.

Sound familiar?

Naturally, marketers have (or should have) some knowledge of all these efforts. But does the data come together? It really really should.

Mark Silva, founder and EVP, emerging platforms for Real Branding, put it this way:
“Think of it as a spectrum that runs from collecting data, to understanding behavior, to identifying and leveraging real insights that answer the question of why people do what they do. In my view, you need to triangulate at least three data sets in order to understand behavior: advertising performance, CRM metrics, and social analytics. Understanding behavior isn’t insight per se, but it’s a critical step in identifying genuine insights.”

Without connecting the dots, too many questions remain either unanswered. Peter Platt, president of PSquared Digital, provided this example:

“Too often, digital efforts are looked at in a silo unto themselves and we miss the real impact that our advertising efforts are having. A great example of this just happened the other day. I was reviewing a law firm client’s web analytics and we saw a huge spike in traffic from search last September. Turns out the hero in this effort wasn’t our search marketing program but rather a heavy TV flight during that time period. In this example we had visibility into the overall marketing effort, but if we hadn’t there might have been erroneous decisions made about how to allocate resources.”

Peter’s effort clearly helped his team find the underlying truth. But why isn’t all our learning leveraged fully? Because, in addition to it being in different places, it’s difficult to rationalize and standardize data sets, and then examine that massive data bank for real insights.

Enter the DMP.

The value of data aggregation
Duh. If you have a tool that can handle it, more relevant data is better. And quite frankly, if we are spending time and money aggregating irrelevant data, well then… I’ll let Tamara Bousquet, SVP-media director of MEA Digital, say it for me:

“My sole focus is to stay ahead of this ever-changing landscape and deliver actionable results for our clients; squeeze every cent of value out of our client’s budget. We find a key challenge for most clients is accurate attribution for different marketing tactics and sales analytics. My team’s analytic approach and deep knowledge of the rich first party information and resources help us understand exactly how all tactics, online and offline, impact our clients business and how to best deliver a positive result.”

Tamara is not alone in leading her team to do this. But the arrival of tools that can do this on a more granular and comprehensive basis can make the process easier, and potentially more effective.


How DMPs work

So what are these things, anyway? In their current incarnations, DMPs deliver marketing performance benefits by helping companies learn from the totality of marketing information they collect and purchase. They represent the antithesis of data silos.

At its core, a great DMP needs to do four things:

•Aggregate data sources: DMPs are designed to take disparate data sets and combine them into a single, actionable data set. We all know that different tools and platforms gather and collect info in different ways. A DSP partner will set up your instance to take into account the sources and differences of your data sets so that information comes together constantly and consistently, with few errors.

•It is essential to know if the platform you select is capable of parsing the information you already have and shows evidence it is planning (or already work with) many more data set flavors. Because one thing we all know is that what we use today may not be what we are using tomorrow. I’m not talking about all of your company’s data (that’s IBM’s job, or Oracle’s). Rather, DMPs focus on marketing relevant information.

•Give you information ownership: Brands deserve to collect and keep all of the information they pay to buy, collect, and base action upon. DMPs bring it all together so that more insights are possible from the combined totality of information.

•Analyze and model: Once the data come together, DMPs offer the means to derive critical information from the data, and work to segment your audience into groups that may warrant tailored marketing efforts. On a blockhead-simple level, a DMP can take a general target, like women aged 18-34, and subdivide it into groupings that help you plan and execute marketing efforts more effectively. This could be based on important demographic criteria, more esoteric psychographic/sociographic ways, or ways you haven’t even considered yet. It may also identify heretofore overlooked populations that may be prime opportunities.

•Drive action: The DMP helps to refine and sharpen ad targeting approaches and purchase media more precisely. For example, a DMP could empower better purchase decisions on the ad exchanges, and continue to collect and refine the learning for greater future precision. This is the “immediate value” DMPs can provide.
Jim Soss, CEO of Red Aril, describes the value proposition of his DMP thusly:

“Red Aril’s DMP was designed explicitly for real-time channels, the ability to leverage all data, and the integration with a broader marketing database strategy. Our clients see the proof every day — data drives relevancy, relevancy drives results.”

A key part of the aggregation service is a standardization of taxonomy. Indeed, it is a critical part of successfully merging data. Scalability is also a critical consideration. A large brand could be experiencing and recording billions of interactions a month across its marketing efforts. The DMP can only be successful if it is able to store, process, and act upon what could easily become an avalanche of data points.

DSP, DMP, LMNOP
Some of you are thinking that other types of marketing service providers offer some of these benefits.

You’re right. They do.

DSPs, for example, are collecting information in real time and using it to dynamically optimize campaigns and programs and enable users to integrate first-party data in real time. Some DSPs are encouraging users to run all their buys through their platforms to provide a more comprehensive audience view.

For example, MediaMath (disclosure, a CSF client) has put a major focus on providing many of the services that are traditionally the turf of DMPs. Their approach is to empower all buying with first and third party data, not just inventory bought on the exchanges. The principle of empowerment through data naturally has big benefits for pub direct. And most brands do not live by exchanges alone. I think it’s natural to expect that all the brands we associate with the DSP sector to move in this direction over time.

The most technologically sophisticated ad networks also work with first-party data, when you choose to provide it. For any business that uses data to define and refine what it is buying or working for you, the race is on to do more with more. As we all know, convergence is the middle name of our industry.

DMP is about driving action from the totality of your marketing-relevant consumer information. You know better than I do whether you are already doing that using a solution that describes itself by whatever name. If not, then the value of the DMP may be significant for you.

In my view, the ideal company for a DMP has data-intensive marketing practices and tactics, and is sophisticated enough that it is focused on incremental marketing improvement. What I mean by that last bit is that a DMP is great for a company that knows it’s doing a lot of things right, and is now looking to drive improvements on their good general direction.

But back to initials. My suggestion is, don’t get caught up in the monikers. Rather, consider whether you think bringing all the data together is likely to provide enough of a business benefit to justify the time and money required to do so. Do you have a strong CRM database? Are you really collecting great information on the site? Are you dealing with multiple media vendors collecting and purchasing data on your behalf separately? If the answer is yes, a DMP may well make sense for you.

Who will adopt these first? DR brands probably come to mind, because the initial focus for actionability will be in ad targeting. But it would be a big mistake for so called brand marketers to discount the value of more complete view of the consumer.

And consider this: data aggregation and modeling is not the same is genuine consumer insight. Says Mark Silva,

“In our business, first customers often have disproportionate influence on how the category plays out. DMPs need to be aware that while their first customers may be DR marketers looking for the magic data bullets that drive incremental sales improvement, behavioral information is not insight. Ultimately their success in the market will be significantly determined by the extent to which they offer the tools and opportunities for brand marketers and agencies to discover genuine behavioral insights. They’re good at getting to the ‘what’ — but they need to also empower us to get to the ‘why’.”

I like that as a concluding thought. It makes sense to get that data together and empower your marketing with it. But don’t leave it at that. It’s not their job to do our thinking for us. We need data to find the answer, and the most effective marketing is going to come from both actionable data and a heckuvalot of noggin’ scratchin’ to discover the seeds of overall brand relevance.

Posted on: 03-12-2011
Posted in: Oldest Living Digital Marketer

Recent Posts

  • Industry News for 05082012
  • Industry Links for 05072012
  • Industry Links for 05092012
  • Simplifying the Display Landscape
  • Viral Vid: Alex and Liam do Wal*Mart
A member of the collective of companies
© 2010-2011 Catalyst SF All Rights Reserved. Website by